Wednesday, December 4, 2019
Comparison of Google and Cisco organization
Question: Compare and contrast the two (2) industries you have identified in terms of size, products, services, customers, economic and regulatory environment. Describe the mission, vision, values and core business practices of each of the companies you selected. Recommend tree to five (3-5) possible HR strategies that will support each organizations mission, vision, values and core business practices for each company. Support your recommendations. Identify how your recommended HR strategies will promote a competitive advantage for each company within their industry. Provide a rationale for your position. Use at least four (4) academic quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia does not qualify as an academic resource. Answer: Introduction This report is comparative study for the Human resource practices of two organizations Google and Cisco. Both the organizations are famous for their human resource practices. Thus, this report discusses various points to understand the human resource of the two companies effectively. Comparison of Google and Cisco organization The following comparison table is showing a comparative analysis of Google and Cisco organization. Particular Google Cisco Size Google has currently more than 70 offices in more than 40 countries. Google currently has more than 53,600 employees working (Boedker, 2014). Cisco is present in more than 300 locations in more than 90 countries and has more than 72,000 employees working. Products services Google started with only search engine but now the products and services of the Google are beyond search. The products and services of Google can be divided into two categories, for businesses and for web. It provides variety of online and offline tools to help businesses in making various types of tasks easy and effective. Advertising programmes of Google helps businesses to grow in the competitive market. It also provides cloud computing tools for businesses which makes organization more productive and saves money. Google tries to build products that makes web better. Product of Google like Android and Chrome make it simpler and faster online service. Open web services are also provided by the Google. Cisco provides the application, networking services, blade switches, networking software, routers, cloud and system management, service exchange, switches, storage networking, conferencing, video, wireless, customer collaboration, unified communication, data centre switches, interfaces and module, infrastructure software. It provides the services in cloud and system management, enterprise network services, collaboration services, security services, collaboration end point services, switching services, services for application networking, conferencing services, enterprise network services, data centre and virtualization services, wireless communication services, video services, unified computing services and unified communication services (Chang, 2005). Customers Samsung, Aerospike, Affini-Tech, Akselos, Alacris Theronostis, Data Stax etc. Afni, alestra, AllConnected, Allied Irish Banks, Americas cup, Anilana resorts and hotels, Aon, Arup group, ASFINA, AT T etc Economic The overall revenue of Google at the end of 2014 was $107.4 billion (Cogin, 2014). The overall income of Cisco was 8,041,000,000 at the end of 2014. Regulatory Environment Google believes that whatever Google is today, it is due to its employees. Google prefers ability than experience. Employees of the organization share common goal and vision for the organization. Positive diversity is in the regulatory environment of the organization. Google maintains the open culture in the organization. Employees are free to share their opinion and ideas. Cisco is a customer focusing organization. There is an environment of innovation, respect and are for other. Cisco values and respects each employees in the organization. It also welcomes the suggestion, opinions and ideas of the employees (Wright, 2005). Mission, Vision, Values and Core Business Practices Google Mission of the Google organization is to properly organize the information of the world and this information can be used and accessed by the people universally. This mission statement of the Google clearly expresses its working of search engine. The vision of Google is to provide access and search facility for each type of website and information available on the web unless it is restricted. It wants to make the search easy and efficient. Google also aims to provide its valuable businesses and websites for their growth in this competitive environment (Bowen Ostroff, 2004). Google values the diversity in the organization. It also prefers the customer satisfaction and cares for its employees. Google also values to deliver quality services and products in the market. Cisco Mission of Cisco organization is to become most strategic partners of the customers by providing the technology and network. It also provides the best quality services in the business architecture built on software platforms, services and integrated products. Vision of the organization is to stay in the top network services provider companies by satisfying the needs and requirements of the customers (Li, 2005). Cisco organization values the customer satisfaction. It understands the needs and requirements of the customer. It values to provide the best working environment to the consumers so that they can deliver the best quality services to their customers. Recommended HR strategies and their analysis Following HR strategies may help in achieving the mission and vision of the organization. Engagement, Retention, Culture and inclusion Of major position, the matter of leading, engaging and attracting persons in a quickly altering world is highest of attention for HR leaders. On a 5 point gauge, the score is three when workers are inquired to rate their happiness or engagement levels at workplace. Performance management A newer and inexpert staff that is producing an increased requirement for development and coaching needs to be recorded and managed in online and systems of learning and recording. Response desires to be derived from several people. Supervisor led assessments are becoming less shared as squads are flattering extra cross-functional (Krenkovic, 2009). Simplifying work Today workers feel they are linked 24/7 being overwhelmed with very much information, various conferences, emails and phone calls and an irresistible amount of jobs on the go. Study designates that the finest method to do it, is by making systems that decrease commute period by providing people the independence to work in spaces where they are maximum creative. Corporate Learning A main challenge for companies is the shortage of critical talent compulsory for an info technologically advanced and dense world. At this point of period, this is essential that specialists constantly reskill themselves to retain with altering needs. One way companies are discovering achievement doing this is over structural learning organizational systems. Conclusion Both Google and Cisco is rated top in great place to work for the employees. Google has grown in just 15 years of career. It is working in more than 40 countries while Cisco has consistently increasing growth. Both organizations are perfectly working with employees but Google is one step ahead from the Cisco organization. References Li, S. (2005). The impact of information and communication technology on relationà ¢Ã¢â ¬Ã based governance systems.Information Technology for Development, 11(2), 105-122. Chang, E. (2005). Employees overall perception of HRM effectiveness.Human Relations,58(4), 523-544. SAKAL, M., (2013). THE Y-GENERATION THROUGH THE PRISM OF HRM.à ââ¬â¢Ã à µÃâà Ãâââ¬Å¡Ã à ½Ã à ¸Ã à º à Ã
¾Ã à ¼Ãâà à à ºÃ à ¾Ã à ³Ã à ¾ ÃâÃâà à ½Ã à ¸Ã à ²Ã à µÃââ⠬Ãâà à à ¸Ãâââ¬Å¡Ã à µÃâââ¬Å¡Ã à °. à à ¡Ã à µÃââ⠬à à ¸Ãâà à à à à ºÃ à ¾Ã à ½Ã à ¾Ã à ¼Ã à ¸Ã à ºÃ à °, (2). KÃâ¦Ã¢â ¢enkov, P. (2009). Short Communication Evaluation of High-Resolution Melting (HRM) for Mutation Scanning of Selected Exons of the CFTR Gene.Folia Biologica (Praha),55, 238-242. Bowen, D. E., Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRMfirm performance linkages: The role of the strength of the HRM system.Academy of management review,29(2), 203-221. Wright, A. D. (2005).U.S. Patent No. 6,866,039. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Cogin, J. A.. (2014, January). Discretionary HRM: How work-life support practices influence firm non-financial performance outcomes. InAcademy of Management Proceedings(Vol. 2014, No. 1, p. 10095). Academy of Management. Boedker, C. (2014, January). How HRM adds Value to a Firm: The Mediating Effects of Flexibility and Capital in the Service Sector. In Academy of Management Proceedings(Vol. 2014, No. 1, p. 10094). Academy of Management.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.